this is a page for

Category: Inter-Dependence with Fed

Build Hawaii Nation!

Boosting Economy and Democratic Socialism

Democratic socialism may not be necessarily bad; but many people may be concerned, e.g. how (state) government can generate more money for social service and people’s welfare.
In that, boosting our economy in Hawaii way, not too dependent on fed for our financial support, may be crucial.
In other words, we may need to find ways to correctly raise necessary taxes, (if any), while maximizing in having support from fed.
Simply, if we can boost our economy in balanced ways, then we would be able to increase much more of our (state) government tax revenues for social welfare, redistributing our wealth, properly and in the correct and better way.
Aloha.

Energy Reform?

Energy Reform?

Two days ago, I met a man who suggested having nuclear power plant; since he said we have continuous presence of nuclear submarines here in Hawaii and one submarine can sufficiently provide energy that whole island can use.

It may not be a bad idea.

(We can also think of utilizing our natural energies like solar, wind, and water. And, we should study what may be more feasible, esp. costeffectively.)

If nuclear power (plant), then, the first thing I can think of is “safety”. But, having constant presence of military and nuclear equipments may not give an added risk to us.

There may be other factors we may have to think; among other things,

If so, HECO may need to change, although they may not like the idea. But, e.g. if we can give them significant management rights and support on the prospective nuclear plant, then they may accept the idea.

Reduction in energy costs are very imperative in boosting our economy, esp. if we bring manufacturing sectors for balanced growth.

More studies and conversations with fed and people related in the industry may be necessary.

Aloha.

Regarding Missile Alert…

Hearing on False Alarm at East West center.

Governor should be the first in line to (try to) fix this issue; (while the congressional delegation are doing their works in the legislature).

If elected as governor, I would put myself first in line in resolving this issue, thru constant dialogue with fed officials in Washington DC (and Hawaii) and thru diplomacy.

Our security should be number one issue; and I don’t feel comfortable that Gov. Ige may not be currently (actively) in control of the issue, (even if he made bad judgments or mistakes previously).

Aloha.

More Controlled Freedom on Economy

How about more freedom, but more controlled freedom?

Ever since the statehood in 1959, Hawaii have enjoyed economic prosperity but, probably much unevenly, e.g. due to ever shrinking middle class.

One reason may be due to our heavy depedence on Fed.

From Fed’s stand point, Hawaii might have played a significant role, e.g. in its strategic and georaphical importance. And, Tourism.
But, in return, we might have relied too much on their help, e.g. government funding.

However, our many local politicians might have been focusing more into local (micro?) issues than participating in macro economic policy issues involving Hawaii, leaving them more to Fed. As a result, we might have lost our control, esp. in economy.

As much as we rely on Fed financially, we may need to develop our own way to economic independence.
Simply, we need to control and grow our own economy in Hawaii way, e.g. especially due to geopraphic location.

As long as we can and try to follow and communicate with Fed, we should have all freedom to grow our economy in our own way.

I call it more controlled freedom (on economy); e.g. more diversified economy and for sustainabilty.

(And, we should be self sufficient or sustainable, in case we become isolated e.g. due to some emergencies in the mainland.)

We have population of 1.5 million; and, it may grow more. We need balanced economic growth and sustainability.

In that, bringing manufacturing jobs and sectors to Hawaii economy should be good and necessary; although there may be some compromise, expected in natural environment. (Please, remember Priorities; choice of better evil?..)

Aloha.

Note: E.g. We may need to utilize our maritime transportations more efficiently, e.g. bringing back interisland ferries, for the purpose of promoting and/or revitalizing our economy thru more frequent traffic and balanced utilization of the lands as well as redistribution of polulation and wealth.

How About Me, President Trump?

If President Trump and Kim Jung Un meet in Hawaii, then President Trump can have me as one of his advisors as well as interpreter, since I can directly understand Kim Jung Un without translation, and I may also be one of the intellectuals among 1st (or 1.5 ) generation Korean immigrants.
Furthermore, since I might have already been considered as next governor of Hawaii to some republicans (and their imposters), it may be better to establish some new relationship (between Fed and Hawaii).
Aloha.

Let Us Improve and Diversify Our Economy for Sustainability.

If elected as Governor, one of my primary focuses may need to be on balanced growth in economy. In that, diversification of the economy, e.g. bringing in manufacturing industry, may be necessary.

I know it is a controversial issue; but some compromise in natural environment may be necessary, while not neglecting in searching for alternatives or other options; but at least to reach the goal of our self-sustainability. (I know it may sound silly or insulting; but probable negative impact on environment, due to e.g. bringing manufacturing industry, may not be as much, thanks to our geographic location, which is in the middle of the ocean; as long as we can try to help maintain current level of our natural environment, e.g. for tourism.)

But, unless we diversify and improve our economy, and not relying too much on federal government, our future may not be bright. And, fundamentally, our sociopolitical issues and corruptions may also be correlated to this fact.

Let us work on improving and diversifying our economy for balanced growth.

Aloha.

Keywords: Diversification and balanced growth, Inter-dependence with Fed.

My (tentative) plan for Rail.

“Mr. Kalawe,
When it comes to sharing costs, fundamentally, we should help one another, (if we really need to share), because we are Ohana, after all.

But, I feel for you and don’t blame you if you feel bad about sharing the cost of rail, probably because of corruptions.

Although my plan (about rail) may need to be adjusted (later, as needed), but currently, (among other things),

1. Forensic audit first, and find out exactly why the cost had to be increased a lot more than initially projected.
2. If any wrongdoings are found, find a way to get compensated from the responsible people and/or their insurers. (E.g. If we can get any money from liability insurance, it would be good.)
3. Recalculate by exploring all plausible options; and, if possible, find a way to reduce the cost; and adjust the previous estimate accordingly.
4. If we can lower the cost, see if we can extend the rail all the way to UH at Manoa. (But, plan it for the future, in the long run, even if the cost is the problem for the near future.)
5. If more federal money can be explored, negotiate more with Fed. (I will not hesitate to visit Washington, DC, to discuss and negotiate with fed officials including President.)

These are just my thoughts, and may be adjusted as needed.

Aloha.”

From FB

What if Richard Kim as Governor vs Mr. Trump?

Note: More conversations can be found in Richard Kim for Governor, since there have been more conversations after my post here. Thanks.

Both Positive and Negative Feelings Toward Mr. Trump…

My conversation with a person (republican?) on Richard Kim for Governor.

When Dealing with Mr. Trump, Proceed with Priorities and in Mature Way…

Work Toward Jones Act Reform…

Well,
One main reason may be the national security issue.
The question is how hard for Hawaii politicians to push and convince the Fed, even if they want to address the issue in Washington, DC..?
At least, they should demand more of compensations if Fed is not willing to repeal or reform; (esp. whenEVER we encounter prospective economic hardship due to the Jones Act, while actively working toward our balanced economic growth).
Until we get the reform or repeal, however, we should continuously pressure Fed. (At the same time, we may need to continuously find a way to assure or reinforce the national security.)
Grassroot Institute: Hawaii Politicians are missing the boat on Jones Act Reform – Hawaii Free Press

Jones Act Reform !

(For betterment of Hawaii’s balanced economic growth), I agree that Jones Act should be reformed and/or abolished.
However, we may need to assure Fed how we maintain (or strengthen) national security, in exchange for the reform…

Grassroot Institute of Hawaii; Jones Act dissed in D.C.

Dear Gov. Cayetano,

Dear Gov. Cayetano,
I understand and feel your frustration and anger, but your approach, asking Mr. Trump to ditch the Rail, which has been already in progress, may not be good and positive.
If I were you, I would specifically name those people, who and how are corrupting the project, and denounce them in public.
Then, they may change their behavior in humiliation.
I know you (and some people) may think it is not Aloha, but please, remember they are the ones who violated the Aloha.
(And, we can always forgive them later in Aloha.)
Above all, for future of Hawaii, it may be better.
We need to promote and preserve true value of Aloha Spirit…!

Note: (From my perspective and thinking); those who are corrupting the Rail project may hold the key and know the effective solution to finish the project, probably better than many other people. So, their changed behavior may be imperative and important.
Also, while looking for better alternatives and options for the project to finish effectively, we may need to ask Fed to be more patient with us. That is why I said in earlier post, our local politicians should have worked more INTER-dependently with Fed.

Papahanaumokuakea, Not a Partisan Issue.

Regarding Civil Beat’s article on April 18, 2017, “Leave Papahanaumokuakea Protections In Place”

I agree that it is not a partisan issue.
However, People of Hawaii elected the local politicians, hoping that they would work more for Hawaii’s best interest, or at least as much as Fed’s interest.
If Fed interest is so high, e.g. for conservation and/or national security issue, then, in return for giving up our business interest, local politicians should have demanded Fed more or comparable compensations, e.g. in other Fed programs in and/or for Hawaii, (not to mention alternative? compensation to those fishery).
We need more local politicians who can promote and work INTER-dependently with Fed.
We don’t need “yes-men” among our politicians.
I know sometimes politics may not be easy, and you may need to work together with other (e.g.democratic ) colleagues; (and sorry to say this); but, (among others), Shame on you, Senator Shatz.
Shame on you, Governor Ige.
You might have not considered the first and primary fiduciary duty to People of Hawaii.
At least, you should have explained more clearly to People of Hawaii, what is (are) specifically better, e.g. alternative? economic interest, for Hawaii, in such expansion and designation, (more than environmental effect, which may have not been much scientifically proven; and more than superficial “co-stewardship” with Fed over the monument.).
How are we going to maintain (and improve) our sustainability if we continue to lose our economic interest in this way, without getting clear and adequate compensations from Fed, (and/or without finding alternative way)?
Aloha.

Think about Hawaii, too…

When thinking for and with Fed, we may need to think about ourselves, Hawaii, too.
If Fed interest is so high, then, in return for giving up our business interest, we should have demanded more compensations, e.g. in other Fed programs in and/or for Hawaii, (not to mention alternative? compensation to those fishery).
How about more fed money and leniency on our controversial Rail project, although our corruption or mismanagement issue, which may be related to Rail, may also need to be worked on by ourselves.
We need more politicians who can work INTER-dependently with Fed.
We don’t need “yes-men” among our politicians.
I know sometimes politics may not be easy, and you may need to work together with colleagues; (and sorry to say this); but, (among others), Shame on you, Senator Shatz.
Shame on you, Governor Ige.
At least, you should have explained more clearly to People of Hawaii, what is (are) specifically better for Hawaii, in such expansion and designation, (more than environmental effect, which may have not been much scientifically proven).
Note: There may be not much practical benefits for Hawaii, in exchange for the expansion of the marine monument. E.g., co-ownership? or co-stewardship of the monument may not do much good other than superficial? benefit.

Civil Beat’s article, “The Fight Over Papahanaumokuakea Just Escalated”

Regarding Expansion of Papahānaumokuākea Monument

Dear US Senators and Congresswoman from Hawaii,
If and when the state’s and national interests may be in conflict, please think more carefully and thoughtfully…e.g. by negotiating or bargaining?
Please, remember and don’t forget that you are representing Hawaii people, too…!!
(I am sure you would do your best, but it is just a reminder…!?)
Note: My previous post comment.
“Well, if the expansion of the national monument is not much backed by science, then there may be better? reason behind? (Yup, the environment and its conservation effort is important, but may be not strong enough reason to kill State’s commercial fishery. Well, the national monument might have already been there for the purpose…)
How about strategic (military) importance of the area?
If so, Fed might have won over the Fed’s vs State’s interest.
Just my thought.”

Papahanaumokuakea Expansion Is Counterproductive for Hawaii’s Sustainable Fisheries?

National Geographic; Papahanaumokuakea Expansion Is Counterproductive for Hawaii’s Sustainable Fisheries