(This was published on Feb 8, 2020 on my personal page on Facebook.)

People may wonder what entails Media Reform; if they have determined to do better job for people of Hawaii or not.

Personally, (at a personal level), I would consider they are doing better job; among other things,

1. If they publicly announce that they are sorry they did not cover my candidacy as Governor.

2. If they apologize Hawaii people that they did not report about my court actions regarding the prior election; among others,

A. My complaint about the chief election officer, Scott Nago, that he (allegedly) did not do the correct job, esp. about Ms. Hanabusa’s (alleged) disqualification as a Governor candidate, since she violated the State mandate, Article II, section 7, “resign to run”.

B. If Governor Ige (allegedly) illegally donated 1 million dollars to Korean community or not.

C. If the Hawaii Court(s) did the correct job on my complaint(s) or not.

(Among others, simply, the Court denied one suit, stating I made the complaint, allegedly, based on a rumor.
My position was the motion brought by Gov. Ige should have been denied since there have been e.g. a competing evidence that, I claimed, the 1 million dollars were a bribe, and by law, he should have provided the corresponding documents if they were government grant money.)

D. If the Hawaii Court decided correctly about my motion to stay of the election due to my (alleged) complaint(s) or not.

Note: Fyi, Media did not report ANY of those, but also not covered my candidacy at all. (Perhaps, to them, they were the news that are not important to Hawaii people???…lol.)

(If any, I also invite any lawyers to join the discussion here about the above cases.)